Robert Duncan lacked evidence that age discrimination was really behind his termination, the US District Court for the Sixth Circuit said Wednesday. Duncan, who had worked for Sam’s since 1993 and had managed the company’s North Dayton store since 2008, alleged that a previous supervisor’s age-based animus tainted the decision to fire him following the April 2019 incident.
He invoked the cat’s paw theory, under which an employer can be held liable when a biased ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.