The company wasn’t liable under the eavesdropping provisions of California Invasion of Privacy Act—which Judge
He granted Quest’s motion for reconsideration because Meta was a direct party to the communications rather than an eavesdropping third party, according to the opinion Tuesday.
Martini had previously found that Meta acted as a third ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
