The US District Court for the District of South Carolina on March 22 granted P&G’s motion to strike class claims because the plaintiff didn’t show a class action was the superior way to resolve product liability, negligence, and warranty claims. The court denied P&G’s motion to dismiss most of the plaintiff’s individual claims.
Joseph Izzo alleged he suffered an eye injury after ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.