A federal judge denied
The suit has standing because “each Plaintiff alleges that she relied on P&G’s representations about the Tampon Products and ‘would not have purchased the Products, or would not have purchased them on the same terms, if the true facts had been known,’” Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, wrote in a Tuesday opinion.
The court did grant P&G’s motion to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.