Several Ohio Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared concerned by a proposal that could lead to plaintiffs’ verdicts in medical malpractice cases, even when most of a jury doesn’t find in their favor.
The justices heard oral arguments on whether jurors in negligence cases, including medical malpractice, must affirmatively answer the first question on a verdict form in order to vote on a subsequent question. Ohio law requires at least three-fourths of a jury to concur for a civil verdict.
The estate of Scott Boldman, which alleges that a nurse anesthetist’s negligence led to his death, argued that any combination ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
