An Ohio Supreme Court justice was deeply interested Tuesday in how the state constitution mandates gender-affirming care for minors, zeroing in on a ban on such care that was vetoed by his father—the governor—but overridden by the state legislature.
Justice R. Patrick DeWine (R) questioned attorney Jordan Bock about the constitutional arguments against the state’s ban, including whether an unchallenged portion of the law prohibiting surgical transitions for minors would have to be put back in effect if the attorney’s arguments won out.
“We’re going to write an opinion,” the justice, whose father is Gov. Mike DeWine (R), told Bock, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
