The Ohio Supreme Court received several comments, publicly released Thursday, on its proposal to allow use of artificial intelligence for some translation of court information, including some that were broadly supportive.
The proposal, which saw its open comment period end this week, would bar court officials from using AI to translate or interpret “substantive legal writings” like legal forms, court orders, or documents listing probation conditions. Officials would also be prohibited from using AI to interpret any “substantive legal proceeding, case, or court function.”
However, courts could use it to translate “non-substantive, non-legal writings” that don’t implicate a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.