Howard Rubin, the ignominious former Wall Street trader accused of violently abusing dozens of women in his Manhattan penthouse, lost his appeal to undo a $3.85 million sex trafficking verdict on Friday.
He challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, claiming the plaintiffs failed to prove that the encounters were non-consensual, or that he knew or disregarded the fact that force or coercion would be used. But the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit disagreed.
Where the evidence shows, like it does in this case, a modus operandi involving force, fraud or coercion, the TVPA’s mens rea element is ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.