New Jersey police use of geofence warrants doesn’t violate constitutional privacy protections and is not an impermissible “general warrant,” a state court ruled Tuesday.
But there are limits on the use of geofence warrants—through which law enforcement demands from wireless company providers the identities of cell phone users in a region at a specific time—the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division ruled in a case of first impression for the state. Specifically, police must to go through a process with providers that requires enough specificity to support probable cause in a warrant.
“The vice of a general warrant is eliminated ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.