National Football League subscribers who won a $4.7 billion verdict defended the federal jury’s math in court filings, saying it is within the range supported by evidence.
The verdict was significantly less than the $7 billion the subscribers asked for, their attorneys said in a Wednesday motion, adding that modern antitrust cases can involve damages at that scale “given the amount of commerce at stake.” They asked Judge Philip S. Gutierrez of the US District Court for the Central District of California to leave the verdict intact and deny the league’s alternative motion for a new trial.
The National ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.