The lower court found that the investors lacked proof of deceptive intent by the pharmaceutical company and its executives in statements about the EpiPen’s rebate classification, the appeals court said in an unsigned, unpublished decision. The panel rejected the investors’ argument that the judge’s finding on intent didn’t apply to those statements.
And the investors failed to connect their stock losses to disclosures about ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.