Nina Li’s evidence includes that her complaints weren’t properly investigated, her mentee was criticized into resigning, and she suddenly received negative performance evaluations from the supervisor who discriminated against her and the mentee, US District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Jeffrey S. White said. Merck justified the poor evaluations and Li’s termination by pointing to her performance issues, but the timing of and explanations for the negative reviews ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.