People hit with retaliatory lawsuits after exercising their First Amendment rights are expected to face a simpler process for defeating meritless cases, under a revised framework the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued Thursday.
The justices altered their criteria for applying the state’s anti-SLAPP law—which seeks to prevent what are known as strategic lawsuits against public participation—in two opinions over a land dispute and a permitting disagreement. The law is meant to create a quick and cheap way for courts to throw out meritless lawsuits that were filed to retaliate against people for exercising their First Amendment rights.
The guidance aims ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
