Madigan Corruption Oral Argument Focuses on Whose Intent Matters

In considering the high-profile corruption convictions of ex-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan (D), the Seventh Circuit on Thursday drilled down on a key question: How should jurors consider an alleged bribe-taker’s intent?

Under the US Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Snyder v. United States, it doesn’t matter whether an official actually meant to take any action after accepting a bribe, said Assistant US Attorney Julia Schwartz.

The arguments could have consequences far outside Illinois. Experts have said Madigan’s appeal and that of the related “ComEd Four” case might ultimately give the US Supreme Court a chance to further narrow ...