The plan participants accused the social media site of violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for allegedly retaining “imprudent investments instead of readily available suitable alternative” ones and causing the plan to pay unreasonable expenses. Plaintiffs’ experts estimated damages from $3.9 million to $15.9 million during the six-year class period.
Judge
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.