An Indiana appeals court declined to revive a derivative malpractice lawsuit filed by a shareholder in a consumer collections law firm against against outside lawyers hired to assist his office’s merger with a larger practice.
The Court of Appeals of Indiana said on Thursday that Glenn Vician’s claims against the firm Bingham Greenbaum & Doll LLP were not only time-barred, but lacked merit.
Vician sued BGD in April 2018, three years after his collection firm, Bowman Heintz Boscia & Vician PC, completed an asset sale to a larger out-of-state firm, and paid him for his shares in BHBV.
Vician had ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.