San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer ruled the plaintiff, identified as Dr. Doe, sufficiently alleged violation of the California Medical Information Act, privacy rights, fraud, and other claims.
Doe’s case stems from allegations that a number of Kaiser’s LGBTQ+ physician leaders were investigated in 2018 amid claims of sexual workplace misconduct and substance use.
One investigation involved Doe’s ex-fiancé,who was the then-assistant chief of hospitalist medicine, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.