A ex-United Airlines employee failed to demonstrate that the airline’s alleged treatment of her would have convinced a reasonable jury that she was discriminated against due to her age, a federal judge said, putting an end to her case without a trial.
Mary Ann Arnold alleged that she was constructively discharged after being placed on a performance improvement plan she disagreed with, and being micromanaged by her supervisors. But Arnold’s evidence and assertions about the series of events surrounding the PIP didn’t demonstrate the need for a trial on her age discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge claims, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.