The home improvement giant didn’t need to warn of the potential danger because Officer Rogelio Santander was acting within the scope of employment and performing emergency services, the unanimous court said.
In such a scenario, an officer “should anticipate in a way that an ordinary citizen might not that a suspect could have a concealed weapon,” ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
