A federal law barring alleged domestic abusers from having a gun doesn’t violate the Second Amendment, the Fifth Circuit said Tuesday, reversing itself after the US Supreme Court upheld a related provision of the same statute.
Because alleged domestic abusers pose a clear threat of violence, the measure is constitutional under the high court’s United States v. Rahimi ruling, Judge
The appeals court left the door open for the law to be held unconstitutional in some instances. While nixing Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan’s facial challenge to the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
