Eric Rahman’s allegations under the military-status provisions of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act fell short because he didn’t sufficiently assert having worked in the state or that the company’s actions underlying his termination and other mistreatment occurred there, the US District Court for the Northern District of California said. The details regarding the location of Rahman’s employment were “sparse” and suggested he worked mostly from ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.