Attorneys challenging the apportionment of one pool of attorneys’ fees that is part of a $1.51 billion settlement resolving litigation related to genetically modified corn failed to adequately address why the allocation plan within their fee pool was improper, a federal appeals court said Wednesday.
“All of the arguments that the Objecting Firms raise in their opening briefs relate to issues that we have already decided,” the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit said. “We will not—and cannot—do the Objecting Firms’ jobs for them.”
The litigation concerned claims that farmers were locked out of the Chinese market after ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.