The plaintiffs’ negligence theory is viable even though they don’t contend that the drug they used was flawed, the California Court of Appeal said Tuesday.
“No California case appears to have expressly considered” the relationship between “defect” and “negligence,” wrote Associate Justice Jeremy M. Goldman for California’s First District Court of Appeal in the published opinion.
Nevertheless, “we conclude that the legal duty of a manufacturer to exercise reasonable care ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.