The Florida Supreme Court indicated Wednesday it favors strictly enforcing a private whistleblower statute, taking a dive into the dictionary to support requiring employees to prove “actual” violations to get protection.
A majority of the court said that the word “is” in the state’s whistleblower statue could mean the prevailing standard relying on a worker’s “good faith” belief of employer violations should be rejected.
The legislature “chose to define the wrongdoing,” said Chief Justice Carlos G. Muñiz. “It’s like you’re running up against a linguistic wall.”
For decades courts across the country have interpreted this language as requiring an employee’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.


