The ruling Tuesday by the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas said the former employee adequately alleged each prima facie element of age discrimination. His firing was an adverse employment action, and the significant sales and management experience he brought to Google and his performance during his first two years at the company showed he was qualified. He was around 64 years old when he was terminated, putting him in the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.