Former
The three-judge panel, affirming a district court ruling, found that La Belle isn’t a protected whistleblower because he complained about violations of an internal policy that was implemented by Barclays to prevent fraud, not a policy required by the federal government.
“We see no reason to disturb the district court’s conclusion that La Belle failed to establish a whistleblower retaliation claim on this basis,” the judges said in their opinion ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.