The former customer service coordinator’s failure to respond to the drug testing company’s numerous phone calls and voicemails alerting her to the positive test result undermined her ability to prove intentional bias, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said. Her contention that the testing company should’ve tried to contact her another way was unreasonable because she listed the phone number it called 11 times on her drug testing form ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.