A consumer’s proposed class action alleging
The challenged label statements weren’t “alleged to be affirmatively inaccurate, or contradictory to the Nutrition Facts Panel, because none of the challenged statements reference the sugar content of the product,” the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said in a summary order. Judges
- The judges distinguished the case from one where a consumer’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.