- Company CEO says no power-line problems detected before blaze
- Complaints cite witnesses who saw flames below power lines
The first of several suits filed Monday was brought on behalf of a group of homeowners, renters, business owners and others with properties destroyed by the deadly Eaton Fire in the Pasadena area. The complaints allege that Southern California Edison power lines were the cause of the blaze that leveled the community of Altadena. The initial suits are expected to be followed by thousands more legal claims.
Edison International Chief Executive Officer
Read More:
The suit claims Edison didn’t properly maintain its electrical infrastructure, presenting “an inherent risk and danger of fire to private property” and that the company’s vegetation management wasn’t compliant with local rules. It seeks damages for property losses caused by the raging fires in and around the Eaton Canyon area.
“Edison knew about the significant risk of wildfires caused by its aging and overloaded utility towers and power poles before the Eaton Fire began,” according to the complaint.
As of early Monday, the Eaton Fire was 33% contained but had consumed more than 14,000 acres, destroyed or damaged thousands of structures and killed at least 16 people.
Natural Disaster
Angelenos have been unnerved as fires have spread across the city and its surrounding communities over the last week, turning thousands of homes and businesses into charred rubble. The fires are the most devastating natural disaster to strike Los Angeles since the 1994 Northridge earthquake, which killed 57 people, and are likely to rank among the costliest natural disasters in modern US history.
The first suit, filed by Los Angeles lawyer
One of the residents said he walked outside that Tuesday night and approached a tower holding Edison’s power lines and found “a fire maybe knee high” had started at its base, according to the suit. A resident who hikes in Eaton Canyon said he’d recently noticed the area was “full of dry debris and dead brush,” according to the complaint, which is peppered with photos and maps of the area.
Edison Analysis
Edison said in a regulatory filing last week that attorneys for insurance companies had asked it to preserve evidence for the Eaton Fire, where it had an energized transmission line. Edison
“We have not seen in our telemetry any indication of an electrical anomaly,” Pizarro told Bloomberg Television. “Typically, when you have a fire across infrastructure, you see voltage dropping. We have not seen that in our study.”
Southern California Edison had intentionally cut power to more than 100,000 homes and businesses as gusts strengthened to reduce the risk of its wires sparking fires.
Rosemead, California-based Edison’s shares fell about 12% Monday at the close of NY trading. The company’s bonds
History of Wildfires
The state has a history of catastrophic wildfires tied to electric-utility equipment operating during wind storms.
Under
Edison’s equipment was
Utilities in western states including Oregon, Colorado and Hawaii also have been pummeled with litigation over devastating fires. Last year, Hawaiian Electric Industries agreed to pay about half of a $4 billion settlement of home and business owners’ suits tied to the 2023 Maui wildfires. That settlement is still awaiting final approval.
The first case is Gursey v. Southern California Edison Company, 25STCV00731, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, Central District (Los Angeles).
(Updates with multiple lawsuits in second paragraph, interview of Edison CEO starting in third paragraph.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Steve Stroth
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.