Dow argued that a line of Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions holding that the cap violates the uniformity clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution—but only applying that ruling prospectively to future tax years—didn’t apply to its case.
Those decisions involved companies attempting to collect refunds on unconstitutional taxes that already had been paid, whereas Dow was challenging its liability before paying them, it said.
The ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.