US District Judge
The ruling is a major setback for Disney in its ongoing feud with DeSantis. Disney
Disney filed its notice of appeal on Thursday. The case will now go to the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta.
“This is an important case with serious implications for the rule of law, and it will not end here,” a Disney spokesman said in a statement Wednesday. “If left unchallenged, this would set a dangerous precedent and give license to states to weaponize their official powers to punish the expression of political viewpoints they disagree with. We are determined to press forward with our case.”
Disney claimed in its suit that DeSantis was engaging in a campaign of retaliation against the company for speaking out against a state law that bars classroom instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation. The governor’s actions violated its constitutional right to free speech, Disney said.
DeSantis spokesman Jeremy Redfern said Wednesday that the ruling reinforces the declaration made by the governor when he created the new board: “The Corporate Kingdom is over.”
“The federal court’s decision made it clear that Governor DeSantis was correct: Disney is still just one of many corporations in the state, and they do not have a right to their own special government.,” Redfern said.
The dispute had been political fodder for DeSantis in his campaign for the Republican 2024 presidential nomination. He withdrew from the race in late January and endorsed former President
But his apparent vendetta against one of Florida’s largest employers also cut against his business-friendly image and was heavily criticized by major Republican donors and political rivals. Soon after Disney filed its suit, former South Carolina Governor
Winsor said Disney failed to show that its alleged injury — operating under a board it can’t control — was traceable to DeSantis’ control.
“That injury would exist whether or not the governor controlled the board,” the judge said.
He also said the Disney’s claims that its First Amendment rights were violated failed because of legal precedents holding that an unconstitutional motive — punishing free speech — doesn’t invalidate an otherwise constitutional law.
“The Legislature can determine the structure of Florida’s special improvement districts,” Winsor said. “Disney does not argue that the First Amendment (or anything else) would preclude the Legislature from enacting the challenged laws without a retaliatory motivation.”
The ruling does not affect a parallel state lawsuit between Disney and DeSantis allies, which is ongoing.
Winsor, a
The case is Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US Inc. v. DeSantis, 4:23-cv-00163, US District Court, Northern District of Florida (Tallahassee).
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.