A California man who conditionally pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm won his bid to suppress evidence seized during a purported inventory search of his vehicle after the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, agreed on Thursday that the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights.
The deputies’ deviations from administrative procedures that govern inventory searches indicated they acted solely for investigative purposes, a deeply divided Ninth Circuit said.
Inventory searches of impounded vehicles, where the process is “aimed at securing or protecting the car and its contents,” are a well recognized exception to the Fourth Amendment’s ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.