A Dallas man was unable to undo his bank fraud and money laundering conspiracy convictions Wednesday after a federal appeals court found he received a fair trial.
Jon “Phillip” Page Jr. challenged, among other things, the trial court judge’s refusal to recuse himself, citing a prior relationship with the bank. But he failed to explain how the judge’s representation of the bank in an unrelated civil appellate matter required recusal, and the government cited “meaningful authority” showing that recusal hasn’t been required in similar circumstances, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said.
Phillip’s co-conspirators were his brother, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.