The plaintiffs, who lived and worked in flood-prone areas, plausibly alleged they were third-party beneficiaries of an agreement that allows the city to forestall flooding by barricading a levee system gap created by a railroad underpass, the court said Tuesday. The plaintiffs say the railroad breached its obligations under that agreement.
But federal law bars the plaintiffs’ tort-based claims alleging the railroad should have should have operated, maintained, and constructed its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.