A district court failed to give a “concise but clear” explanation for the calculation it used in awarding more than $300,000 in attorney fees and costs to a Sam’s Club employee, a federal appeals court said, vacating the award and remanding the case.
The Ninth Circuit found that the employee—Claudia Alvarado, who worked for the
However, “the district court failed to provide an adequate explanation for its award,” ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.