PRL USA Holdings Inc., a Ralph Lauren subsidiary, won summary judgment against a man with a criminal conviction for selling counterfeit Ralph Lauren products, but disputed factual issues relating to the man’s store remain necessitating a trial on the claims against it.
The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Thursday rejected Khaled Mir’s argument that his use of the Ralph Lauren trademarks didn’t cause consumer confusion.
“There is no legitimate question as to whether the counterfeit Ralph Lauren products Khaled Mir admitted to selling, products that are at issue in this case, caused confusion—that is the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.