David Jarvis could convince a jury that the alleged reprisals he was subjected to—negative job review, performance improvement plan, and termination—occurred within a time frame to support a causal link between his discrimination reporting and subsequent retaliatory job action, the US District Court for the District of Hawaii said Tuesday.
Corteva asserted that the negative review and performance plan were justified by Jarvis’ sub-par output ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.