The lead plaintiffs offered no support for their allegation that reasonable consumers understand Tom’s use of “natural” to mean its products don’t contain synthetic or highly chemically processed ingredients, a federal judge said.
They offered consumer surveys, government guidance, and other proof purporting to establish a reasonable consumer’s understanding of “natural” that supported their theory, but it was rejected Wednesday by Judge Kimba M. Wood of the US District Court ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.