ClassPass Inc. failed to convince a federal appeals court Thursday that a consumer suing over its auto-renewal process was bound by a provision in the company’s terms of service to arbitrate her claims.
Ambiguous language on the pages that take a user through the sign-up process undermined their assent to the terms, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said in a split decision.
Plaintiff Katherine Chabolla sued ClassPass after it resumed charging consumers for their fitness class packages a year after it paused charges during the first few months of the pandemic in 2020. ClassPass argued that ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.