The ruling by the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri is a reminder that not all derogatory remarks about a worker’s religion or another protected status count as direct proof of bias. A comment must be made by a decision-maker and related to the challenged employment action to be direct evidence.
Daniel Boyd lacked direct evidence he was fired because of his faith because none of the managers he cited as ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.