The ruling Thursday adds to a divide among federal trial judges on how to determine when a worker is permitted to invoke the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act to keep claims in court. With its ruling denying Chipotle’s motion to compel arbitration, the US District Court for the District of Minnesota joined two other federal courts in reading the EFAA’s use of the word “dispute” to mean when a disagreement arises between an ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.