The California Supreme Court reversed state appeals court precedent on Monday by striking a rule that time-limited certain opportunities for defendants to challenge a judgment.
The ruling strikes down a holding that motions arguing a defendant wasn’t served properly served must be made within two years. If a motion wasn’t made in two years, a party under the now-stricken rule had to bring a separate legal action, rather than filing within the same case.
Courts had taken that two-year time limit from rules about constructive service, which apply when a person avoids being served or can’t be found. It’s unclear ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
