Second Circuit judges questioned the government’s argument that makers of a rapid-fire gun accessory should remain barred from selling the devices after a Texas court found them to be lawful.
Prosecutor Michael S. Blume said a Brooklyn federal trial court’s preliminary injunction against the sales should remain in place because the vendors and manufacturers induced customers to buy a product that the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives determined was unlawful. Blume also said the defendants engaged in a conspiracy by destroying records related to the devices.
Because the allegations turn on fraud and conspiracy claims, the court ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.