The spinoff wasn’t intended to unlock value for shareholders or reduce debt, as executives had told investors when the company announced its plan to separate its eye-care business in August 2020, plaintiff John Kelk said in the complaint. The spinoff was instead Bausch’s strategy to avoid paying investors who had sued the company for securities fraud, the complaint says.
Kelk and his proposed class seek to recover damages from the company and executives for violations of the Exchange ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.