The investors didn’t acquire the volatility-linked ETNs in a “sale” subject to certain securities law provisions, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said in a novel ruling. At issue was whether the noteholders gave up any value when their VXX ETNs underwent a 4:1 reverse split.
When Barclays exercised its right to split the ETNs, the investors didn’t “lose, or gain, anything: they simply traded in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
