A California federal district court rejected the breach of contract claim, finding that the clause in the contracts regulating customer accounts stating that they may be charged a fee for a balance inquiry when using a non-BofA ATM is unambiguous.
But the district court made unreasonable assumptions about what a “layperson” understood about electronic transmittals that occur between an ATM and the bank, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.