The US Army couldn’t convince a district court to overturn a former chief of surgery’s employment trial win, or that a new trial is necessary on his claims he faced retaliation for complaining of religious and age discrimination.
There was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in favor of Stephen Katz, his damages award wasn’t excessive, the Army forfeited its chance to challenge the jury’s verdict form or their instructions, and improper evidence wasn’t admitted, Judge
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.