The US Army couldn’t convince a district court to overturn a former chief of surgery’s employment trial win, or that a new trial is necessary on his claims he faced retaliation for complaining of religious and age discrimination.
There was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict in favor of Stephen Katz, his damages award wasn’t excessive, the Army forfeited its chance to challenge the jury’s verdict form or their instructions, and improper evidence wasn’t admitted, Judge
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
