A federal appeals court will lift restrictions on the role that
A three-judge panel said in an order on Friday that a Maryland federal judge couldn’t enforce his injunction while a court fight moves forward over the lawfulness of the power Musk is exercising within the Trump administration.
The decision from the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals is a win for the Trump administration’s efforts to wind down the US Agency for International Development and, more broadly, to empower Musk’s government efficiency teams to have broad access and influence at federal agencies.
Read More:
While their order was unanimous, the appeals court judges were divided about the strength of the underlying constitutional challenges.
Evidence in the case showed a strong likelihood that Musk “functioned as an advisor to the president, carrying out the president’s policies of shrinking government and reducing spending, not as an officer who required constitutional appointment,” Judge
In a statement, a lawyer for the current and former USAID employees and contractors who sued over Musk’s influence said he “strongly disagreed” with the panel’s ruling.
“Notably, though, the court did not disagree that USAID’s dismantling likely violated the constitution,” said
Spokespersons for USAID and DOGE didn’t respond to messages seeking comment.
The appeals court decision blocks a
Chuang also found that the Trump administration likely violated separation-of-powers principles in shuttering the congressionally-created agency.
Shutting Down
As part of his injunction, Chuang restricted the ability of Musk and other US officials and employees affiliated with DOGE to play a role in shutting down USAID, or to do other work at the agency without approval from a USAID official.
After a former DOGE team leader at USAID was appointed to a high-level position within the agency, Chuang told the government that his injunction still applied to that official. The judge wrote that he intended his order to cover people with “past or present” ties to DOGE “to prevent circumvention of the injunction.”
The Justice Department argued to the 4th Circuit that Chuang’s order was “an extraordinary intrusion” on the executive branch. Lawyers for the current and former USAID employees and contractors had argued that the Maryland judge had taken appropriate steps to restrain Musk, who had posted online about putting USAID “into the wood chipper.”
In a statement Friday, Secretary of State
“Foreign assistance done right can advance our national interests, protect our borders, and strengthen our partnerships with key allies,” he said. “Unfortunately, USAID strayed from its original mission long ago. As a result, the gains were too few and the costs were too high.”
The case is J. Does 1-26 v. Elon Musk,
(Updates with comment from plaintiffs’ lawyer, statement from secretary of state.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth, Peter Blumberg
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.