The US District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 15 rejected the company’s argument that the definition of “buy” meant rights to use rather than perpetual ownership.
Consumers in California, New York, and Washington brought suits alleging the company deceptively advertised the ability to permanently purchase movies, television shows, and music when all digital content purchases are governed by limited licensing agreements. The consumers say they lost ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.