The US District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 15 rejected the company’s argument that the definition of “buy” meant rights to use rather than perpetual ownership.
Consumers in California, New York, and Washington brought suits alleging the company deceptively advertised the ability to permanently purchase movies, television shows, and music when all digital content purchases are governed by limited licensing agreements. The consumers say they lost ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.