Investors’ claims that
The lower court’s decision to toss the securities fraud case “should be affirmed on at least three independent grounds"—that the challenged statements to investors weren’t false, that the company and its leadership lacked the necessary intent, and that the investors didn’t show the issue was linked to a stock drop, the videogame maker said in an appellate brief.
Two investigations—by California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
